Ask A Question
 
HiRider
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 5
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 3 Years ago Linkback
I 've been working out for years, but I just recently came across this
"heart rate recovery" thing. It makes sense to me that the rate of recovery should be a relevant measurement but it seems to me that the sources I've found on it lack a sensible basis.

They talk about number of beats recovery, instead of percent. (40 beats recovery in 2 minutes, is not the same thing for a person who worked at 140, versus say 180). The duration and type of exercise usually isn't mentioned.
If you do a 30 minute workout, your muscles are more tired and continue demanding blood to a greater degree than if you worked out 10 minutes, or just worked long enough to be breathing hard..

That said,
1] can anybody furnish me a good source(s) on HR recovery that makes more sense than these medical research things I've come across?
2] in my case, my resting HR is 45; max is 200?; and after 27 minutes of exercise at 160+ (appx 80% my max), my recovery after 2 minutes was a 40 beat drop. Is that good, bad or indifferent?
The topic has been locked.

Related Posts:

The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 Cardio Files